I hope to have some photos that just speak for themselves like the kids jumping around playing Wii. It is such a great picture because not only does it show girls up and about playing Wii but it shows excitement for being up and playing Wii not even realizing the “workout” they may be getting. But the other photos I have pretty foreign objects or ideas. I mean who’s heard of XRKade? who’s heard of Gamercize? I think i’ll most likely just be explaining those straight out. My arguement for my paper is that critics are wrong about video games. They are too dangerous to a childs health. They can actually be very helpful towards it. I think the best example in my photos is the two contrasting pictures. The first one is of an overweight kid sitting in a chair playing traditional video games. the next one is of two girls jumping around playing Wii. This shows the evolution of video games and clearly showcases the differences in expenditure of energy between the old and new video games.  I really hope that mypoint is made because I had trouble with my theisis and think that maybe the pictures will show that not only are critics, parents and scholars, being proven wrong but that the evolution of video games is very apparent and especially usefully in fighting childhood obesity.

Advertisement